21. Ott MA ainsi que al., The new trading-off anywhere between hormones contraceptives and condoms certainly teenagers, Perspectives into Sexual and you can Reproductive Fitness, 2002, 34(1):6–14.
22. Wilson EK and you will Koo Hp, Associations ranging from reasonable-money ladies relationship attributes as well as their contraception play with, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2008, 40(3):171–179.
23. Aalsma MC ainsi que al., Nearest and dearest and you will pal closeness to adolescent sexual partners during the link to condom fool around with, Log away from Adolescent Wellness, 2006, 38(3):173–178.
24. Sayegh MA et al., The brand new developmental connection out of relationships top quality, hormonal contraception choices and you will condom low-play with certainly teenage women, Log out of Teenage Fitness, 2006, 39(3):388–395.
twenty-five. Umphrey L and you will Sherblom J, Relational connection and you may risks so you’re able to relationships fix wants: affects towards condom explore, Record of Western College or university Fitness, 2007, 56(1):61–68.
27. Manning WD ainsi que al., Younger mature relationship relationship plus the management of sexual exposure, Population Lookup and you may Coverage Comment, 2012, 31(2):165–185.
twenty eight. Manlove J et al., Adolescent parents inside promote proper care: risk items and you can outcomes for teens and their people, Research Short term, Arizona, DC: Child Style, 2011.
30. DiClemente RJ ainsi que al., Sexual chance behaviors associated with which have earlier sex people: an examination of black teenage females, Sexually Carried Diseases 2002, 29(1):20–24.
thirty two. Fortenberry JD et al., Condom explore since a function of amount of time in the latest and you will established teenage sexual dating, American Diary out of Public Wellness, 2002, 92(2):211–213.
33. Manlove JS, Ryan S and you will Franzetta K, Chance and you will defensive products for the changeover to help you a first sexual relationship with a mature lover, Diary out-of Adolescent Wellness, 2007, 40(2):135–143.
34. Manlove J, Ryan S and Franzetta K, Birth control play with models around the teens’ sexual dating, report displayed within yearly appointment of your own People Relationship out-of America, Philadelphia, .
thirty five. Manning WD, Giordano Pc and you can Longmore MA, Connecting: the partnership contexts away from “nonrelationship” sex, Journal girl baltic hot out-of Adolescent Search, 2006, 21(5):459–483.
thirty-six. Carlson MJ and you will Furstenberg FF, Jr, The results regarding multi-hitched fertility to own adult information and dating, report displayed at the annual appointment of your own Connection for Social Plan Data and you will Management, Arizona, DC, .
37. Lichter DT and Graefe DR, Trying to find a mate? The latest relationship and you can cohabitation histories out-of unwed mothers, in: Wu LL and Wolfe B, eds., Off Wedlock: Explanations and Outcomes off Nonmarital Virility, Nyc: Russell Sage Base, 2001, pp. 317–343.
40. Kirby D, Emerging Answers 2007: Browse Findings with the Software to reduce Teen Pregnancy and Sexually Transmitted Disorder, Washington, DC: Federal Strategy to cease Teenager and Unplanned Pregnancy, 2007.
41. Kirby D, This new perception off applications to increase contraceptive fool around with certainly adult feminine: a glance at experimental and you can quasi-experimental training, Viewpoints towards the Sexual and you can Reproductive Health, 2008, 40(1):34–41.
Jennifer Manlove try program city director and you may elder research researcher, Kate Welti try lookup researcher, E Wildsmith are elder look scientist and you will Megan Barry try browse specialist, all of the during the Child Trend, Bethesda, MD.
In the 1st study, which used a district-urban area decide to try off teenagers during the Kansas, Manning and you may acquaintances nine labeled matchmaking features on one to list off positive attributes (such as for example intimate notice-revelation, intimate love and you will relationships salience) and one list of negative attributes (such as for example dispute and nonexclusivity). They learned that higher score to your both directory was on the faster condom texture. Detailed analyses in addition to advised you to a mixture of high confident and you may large negative results is actually associated with the reduced condom surface.
Into the for every bullet, players were expected “As the big date out-of history interviews, are you inside the an online dating relationship for which you believe off your self within a couple?” I experienced participants to stay an online dating dating once they replied sure and when brand new partner try a recently available relationship partner, in lieu of a partner, cohabiting partner otherwise former partner. Same-sex relationship matchmaking and those where the respondent had before cohabited into companion was in fact excluded. Complete, 4,013 participants claimed a recently available relationships matchmaking throughout 2002–2005. Of the remaining respondents, 553 were not in the take to from inside the series interesting, 1,876 have been cohabiting or partnered, and 2,542 had no current matchmaking relationship. Respondents inside our try have been aged 18–26.
Matchmaking relationship are based on a few procedures. The original are an excellent 0–ten level in which participants ranked the possibility which they and their mate would be together inside six months. A score off no shown no way; good 10 indicated 100% chances. We classified so it likelihood because the lowest (less than six), typical (6–9) or large (10). With the next measure of relationship, i incorporated a variable getting whether or not the partners had discussed wedding or cohabitation; solutions was classified because chatted about neither, discussed cohabitation otherwise talked about relationships. (Respondents who said that have discussed each other cohabitation and you can relationship was integrated regarding the marriage classification.)
Heterogeneous birth control effects inside long run dating can also help determine all the way down contraception texture into the lengthened adolescent relationship, even after higher odds of ever-accessibility contraceptives. thirty two, 33 Earlier studies have interpreted it finding from the positing one to lovers are prepared to sometimes forgo contraception use in much more serious dating; thirty-two, 34 although not, the overall performance advise that reduced birth control use tends to be centered into the long-emergency room title dating characterized by high argument minimizing relationship.
20. Ku L, Sonenstein Florida and you will Pleck JH, The fresh personality off young men’s condom explore through the and you will round the dating, Nearest and dearest Considered Perspectives, 1994, 26(6):246–251.
Partilhar.